|
Solar Cooker - AndyPryke.com
Parents: MyBlog > BlogJanuary2009 > BlogFebruary2009 > BlogMarch2009 |
Home, Index, Changes Blog RSS | |
|
Favourite Pages My Blog Best Of Blog 2007 Best Of Blog 2005 Birmingham, How to be Happy, Influenza Pandemic, Moseley Tornado, Misty's Big Adventure, Street Furniture Stickers, Weird Internet Animations Other People's Blogs Birmingham Bloggers Danger! High Postage, Parallax View, Pete Ashton, Silent Words Speak Loudest Please don't ask for a sidebar link as a refusal often offends. Editorial Policy |
Solar CookerFinally seeing a little sun this week inspired me to play with making a solar cooker. Here's some notes on the topicMaterials for Concentrating SunlightFresnel LensesCheap, A4 size, Fresnel lenses can be had for under a pound. I got one from a discount book store. They're sold to magnify text, but can also be used to concentrate solar energy. Disadvantages: For best performance, the angle to the incoming sunlight needs to be exactly 90 degrees; They are designed for accuracy of focussing light, which isn't always the key consideration in solar cooking; My impression is that they reflect quite a bit of light. The focal distance is fixed. Advantages: Light, cheap, sturdy. Concentrate light/heat effectively. Ideas: The light from a lens can be reflected, using a mirror smaller than the lens, onto a target. If several lens/mirror pairs were used, this might be a useful way to concentrate a fair amount of energy on a small target. For example, 5 lenses arranged in a cross shape (all at right angles to the incoming sun) could supply energy to 5 sides of a cubic target. A back of the envelope calculation (210mm × 297mm * 5) shows that this would capture light from about 0.3 of a square meter, and could concentrate (when ideally aligned) onto a target cube with edges of about 5cm. Conclusions: Probably more useful for melting or burning things than cooking!Old CDsI've lots of old CDs knocking about, each is quite an effective mirror. A rough test showed that yes, if you can align them correctly, they do seem to work to concentrate energy. They were a pain to arrange for the test, requiring lots of blue tack, and wedges to keep them at the correct angles. If mounted on an appropriately curved surface, they could provide a good and pretty reflector. Maybe useful for a semi-permanent installation like a solar BBQ. Disadvantages: Fiddly to mount. Hole in the middle and non-silvered areas make gaps in coverage. Advantages: Like a lot of little mirrors. Effectively free. Seem relatively robust as mirrored surface is protected by plastic. Ideas: Some sort of cheap stand which could hold the CDs in the centre and angle them would be great. Mount in a curved concrete bowl for a solar BBQ. Paste on a garden wall to provide extra light for plants.Glass mirrorsDisadvantages: Heavy, breakable, not necessarily on hand in correct sizes. Advantages: High reflectivity. Optically accurate which is useful to reflect light collected by another source) Ideas: Use to reflect light from Fresnel lenses or reflectors onto a central cooker/collector. Handy to make a default "floor" reflector when experimenting.Silver foil on corrugated cardboardPrit-stick seems to stick kitchen foil to cardboard very well. I very quickly made 2 reflectors about 30cm by 60cm out of materials I had lying about. Corrugated cardboard folds well, without tearing, and I found that I could easily fold the reflectors down into a quite small package. This had the side-effect advantage of giving them a natural curved shape when unfolded. Advantages: Cheap, light, flexible, high reflectivity. Easy to make in bulk. Easy to make in any required shape. Foldable. Portable. Provides some insulation if needed. Disadvantages: Not waterproof. Conclusion: The way of the future.Infrared Transmissionhttp://www.solarstop.net/edtm/Energy_Transmission_Measurements.htmTargetsOnce you've focussed the energy coming in, you need to convert it to heat by absorbing it in a "target". Targets are what the light and heat are aimed at. This can be directly onto food, or onto a dark pan/container. So far, I've mainly used a black pan with a black lid. This rests on top of a pyrex dish, allowing light to be targeted at it from below as well as the sides and top. Considerations: The key one is absorption of light/heat. There's no point gathering all that energy if a lot of it is reflected away from the target. Other considerations are the retention of heat by elimination of radiation, convection and conductance. A lighter target would heat up more quickly, but is also more vulnerable to fluctuations in solar input (i.e. clouds!)Transparent Materials to Keep Heat inNow we've concentrated the energy and converted it to heat, we need to keep the heat in one place. Glass or similar materials can reflect Far infrared energy (radiated heat) back to the target and stop it escaping. This is the "greenhouse effect", light and near-infrared energy can get in, but the heat cannot get back out.CalculationsHow much energy can you get from a given size of reflectorAccording to this map of UK insolationHow much water can we raise to 100degrees with 1/2kWh?According to this diagram showing energy stored by hot waterTo Investigate...What are good values for the efficiency approximations. For example, these solar cooker testsOther technology to investigateHeat pumps / heat pipes. These respectively concentrate or selectively transport heat. Could you use them to move heat from multiple sources to a cooker?Seebeck / Peltier Thermo-Electric CellsPeltier Cells (sold here) convert heat to electricity (or vice-versa)... someone has demonstrated using a Peltier cell to convert solar heat to electricityStirling EnginesDrinks Can Stirling EngineProject Websites |
This page linked from: SolarCooker, |
| Powered by TWiki |